Thanks. Amazing what you can read when you know the answer.
On Oct 23, 2007, at 1:25 PM, Piyush Agarwal wrote:
Hi Matt,
Page 9 mentions -
SO F T WA R E
Operating System:
SuSE Enterprise Linux Enterprise SP1
2.6.16.46-0.4-smp #1 SMP Mon Apr 2 17:59:08 UTC
2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
The OS version is missing "SuSE Enterprise Linux Enterprise 10 SP1"
As for JIBE, If you have the .log files which go with the xml files
its easy as they have the complete JIBE output captured verbatim
which you can copy paste in the report. I dont know any automated
way of getting the numbers from the XML... seems it does summarize
the run at the end of then file under the <HTTP_summary> tag.
On 10/23/07, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Oct 23, 2007, at 10:53 AM, Piyush Agarwal wrote:
Hi Matt,
This is a great report .. thanks for taking the time to create it.
Here is my feedback on it-
Run spellcheck :-p there were a few typos here and there like
"enough" spelled "ebnough"
what is a spell checker ?
The Introduction on page 3 takes about PT, that was a metric you
used in the last report, but in this report you are comparing
against G1.1.1. The PT is not being used or mentioned throughout
the remaining of the report.
thanks for catching this. PT is left over from the initial
report. I'll fix that.
Please mention if you need RAIDs or Ramdisks for the DB
K
I think you forgot the mention the OS version... I assume its SLES
"10" SP1
Page 9
Quite surprised that we go from 70M unzipped to 111M after initial
startup (whats the big hitter here.. the logs??)
The URL at the end of page 8 (more info about daytrader) seems to
be incorrect and the link doesnt match the URL
the slowdown in the web primitives is a bit surprising... and yet
the jump in direct mode numbers is pretty cool
The mysteries of life ... it wierded me out as well. I think it
needs to be looked into but it is an external measurement so I
figure putting out the info as it is with all the caveats is better
than waiting another 6 months :)
would have loved to see the Trade Session2JDBC numbers as well
could due that
pg 14, 2nd para, typo "due" --> "do"
doh
can we have an appendix at the end of the report with individual
run results like last time?
Maybe...I have the XML files from JIBE but there doesn't seem to be
a way to regerenate a nice summary...do you know how to do this ?
HTH,
Piyush Agarwal
On 10/22/07, Matt Hogstrom < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
I've been noodling on this for a bit and wanted to give y'all a
gander at what I have for the performance report at this point. This
is based on 2.0.2 and uses DayTrader 2.0. There are a few numbers
that are missing. I originally had planned on not producing them but
the charts look odd with the missing numbers. It includes a
comparison of 1.1.1 and 2.0.2 using DayTrader 1.2 and 2.0. Heh, we
need to release those monsters.
This should be considered an alpha release but will move quickly to
final by the end of the week :)
Please provide your feedback on content, what's interesting, not,
etc.
Thanks for taking a few minutes to look at the draft.
Look at http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/performance/geronimo/2.0/
Geronimo2.0.2PerformanceReport-v01draft.pdf
Thanks
