Thanx Kevan. +1.
Cheers Prasad On 10/26/07, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Oct 26, 2007, at 10:35 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote: > > > I don't see why we shouldn't. But can someone more informed please > > list the pros and cons. > > Here's my list: > > Pro's > > * Easier for other projects to reuse GShell > * Release cycle not tied to Geronimo server release cycle > > Con's > > * Small overhead for being a separately released project -- > documentation, release voting, etc > * Separate source tree can complicate debugging (can make the > counterpoint that debugging GShell is easier...) > > The Geronimo tx-manager components (transaction and connector) is > another example where we've done this. Note that prior to (or > concurrent with) voting on our last two releases, we've been voting > on a tx-manager release. Although it need not be that way, we're > falling into a lock-step release cycle... > > I assume that Guillaume is interested in using GShell outside of > Geronimo. I assume that there will be others... > > I'd support GShell as a subproject... > > --kevan > >
