Then why not make this a real release, with a bin and src zip/tar like we do for the server?
-Donald Prasad Kashyap wrote:
While a part of me seems to agree with you that we should remove the zip file from the samples' wiki pages, a greater part of me feels that we may be forcing some our users to now get SVN. A user who just downloads and installs from a binary server will have no need for svn. But just to get to the samples, he now has to get SVN. Then he has to get maven to play with the samples. So we are making him jump thro' many hoops just to see our prized samples. Hmm.. Cheers Prasad On 10/29/07, Jarek Gawor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:On 10/29/07, Paul McMahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:One other question -- should we try to have parity between what's in samples/trunk and what's in the samples section of the wiki? Are there barriers, technical or otherwise, that make this difficult? http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxSAMPLES/index.html http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/samples/trunk/Yes, definitely. That was the goal for 2.0 samples at least. The wiki documentation should be up to date (expect the artifact version) and all the code in wiki should be in the samples svn. If anything, I would like to remove the attached sample .zip files from the wiki and instead direct the users to checkout the sample code from svn. Also, I think we should release samples at the same time (or close to) when we release Geronimo. Jarek
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
