+1 to that. If we released it, then we could point it to the published binaries.
Cheers Prasad On 10/29/07, Paul McMahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When I mentioned "parity" between svn and the wiki I really meant to > stress the same stuff showing both locations, which I think Jarek's > suggestion would help achieve. Another idea would be to build and > deploy the samples using maven. Then we could point the wiki page at > the maven repo for both the compiled binary and for the source.zip > (which is automatically created by maven). > > Best wishes, > Paul > > On Oct 29, 2007, at 2:12 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote: > > > Binary files in wiki and source in svn? That works for me. > > > > Jarek > > > > On 10/29/07, Erik B. Craig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Prasad, > >> I have put some thought into this myself and agree with you. It > >> would be > >> too much of a hassle for users, I think, if they have to download > >> subversion and maven along with the sample app, and THEN compile it > >> before attempting to deploy it. Probably the best thing would be > >> to have > >> 'releases' or snapshots of the sample apps up on the wiki, along with > >> the source being in the subversion repo. > >> > >> > >> -Erik > >> > >> Prasad Kashyap wrote: > >>> While a part of me seems to agree with you that we should remove the > >>> zip file from the samples' wiki pages, a greater part of me feels > >>> that > >>> we may be forcing some our users to now get SVN. > >>> > >>> A user who just downloads and installs from a binary server will > >>> have > >>> no need for svn. But just to get to the samples, he now has to get > >>> SVN. > >>> > >>> Then he has to get maven to play with the samples. So we are making > >>> him jump thro' many hoops just to see our prized samples. > >>> > >>> Hmm.. > >>> > >>> Cheers > >>> Prasad > >>> > >>> On 10/29/07, Jarek Gawor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 10/29/07, Paul McMahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> One other question -- should we try to have parity between > >>>>> what's in > >>>>> samples/trunk and what's in the samples section of the wiki? Are > >>>>> there barriers, technical or otherwise, that make this difficult? > >>>>> > >>>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxSAMPLES/index.html > >>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/samples/trunk/ > >>>>> > >>>> Yes, definitely. That was the goal for 2.0 samples at least. The > >>>> wiki > >>>> documentation should be up to date (expect the artifact version) > >>>> and > >>>> all the code in wiki should be in the samples svn. If anything, I > >>>> would like to remove the attached sample .zip files from the > >>>> wiki and > >>>> instead direct the users to checkout the sample code from svn. > >>>> > >>>> Also, I think we should release samples at the same time (or > >>>> close to) > >>>> when we release Geronimo. > >>>> > >>>> Jarek > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >
