We definitely need such an adapter interface. This will allow us to not corrupt the target instance, e.g. a minimal server, by installing openejb.
Thanks Anita --- Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So I think we are kind of caught in a catch 22 here... > > The issue is, the server is pluggable for the most part. People > may/may > not want EJB, but definitely want the management capabilities. > > Whats your thought on an adapter interface that provides for full > JSR-77 > compatibility, thus requiring EJB, or a switch that allows for pure > JMX > remoting? This would allow for compliance or be able to leverage the > management without EJB if so desired. > > Thoughts? ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs