> What do you mean by "HTTP interface works badly"? Slow? Exceptions?
It only shows the left frame. The HTML source of the page seems truncated at some point. I couldn't find any entries in the log concerning this problem, I'd investigate further. > What platform are you using? Linux or Windows? Windows XP Pro on my notebook. > As far as I understood you already got a patch for GERONIMO-3757. > If so could you please attach it to the issue? :) What I have now is not a patch, but a hotfix workaround. Sure, I'll try to make a valid patch out of it. What I'm not sure is how should I check the patch before it can be considered valid - sure I can run GUT on Sun and Harmony, but otherwise there's so many Geronimo release bundles and platforms that it would be difficult to make sure I didn't break anything in complex Geronimo structure. > I also think that it would be nice to add the list of Harmony > and Geronimo issues related to Geronimo on Harmony to the wiki page > you have created. Well, I have all the actual issues mentioned there. Do you mean it makes sense to have a separate listing of JIRA numbers somewhere? Do you mean only actual open issues, or fixed/closed also? Vasily -----Original Message----- From: Alexey Petrenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 2:57 AM To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Geronimo 2.0.2 starts on Harmony! Great news, Vasily! What do you mean by "HTTP interface works badly"? Slow? Exceptions? What platform are you using? Linux or Windows? As far as I understood you already got a patch for GERONIMO-3757. If so could you please attach it to the issue? :) I also think that it would be nice to add the list of Harmony and Geronimo issues related to Geronimo on Harmony to the wiki page you have created. Thanks in advance. SY, Alexey 2008/1/18, Zakharov, Vasily M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, all, > > Well, finally I can say Geronimo 2.0.2 starts and works on Apache > Harmony! > Some steps yet need to be taken for that to happen - see [1] for > details. > > Some issues were overcome, some workarounded, and some just hotfixed and > wait for their proper resolution, like GERONIMO-3757. > > Three important problems that still need investigation are: > - HTTP interface works badly (HTTPS works fine). > - The application takes up all the CPU resources on both cores I have > available so the machine is 100% busy. > - The application takes up all the memory specified in -Xms option. > > Otherwise, I was able to browse the console freely and even deploy > SPECjAppServer2004. > No serious load was tested however. > > Vasily Zakharov > Intel ESSD > > [1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC20/Apache+Harmony > >
