-Donald Jarek Gawor wrote:
Thanks, you beat me to it! I'll also update branches/2.0. Jarek On Feb 7, 2008 12:15 PM, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:I just removed the bottom 3 in the 2.1 branch with Rev619508 based on the changes you made in trunk. I'll start looking at pulling jtidy into the local repo next. -Donald Jarek Gawor wrote:I just performed a quick scan for direct snapshot dependencies in branches/2.1, here's the list (excluding jacc spec and ejbcontainer-tests): ./buildsupport/testsuite-maven-plugin/pom.xml: jtidy 8.0-SNAPSHOT ./plugins/monitoring/agent-jmx/pom.xml: xbean-naming 3.4-SNAPSHOT ./testsuite/pom.xml: maven-surefire-plugin 2.3-SNAPSHOT ./buildsupport/geronimo-maven-plugin/pom.xml surefire-api 2.1-SNAPSHOT Jarek On Feb 6, 2008 2:22 PM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:On Feb 6, 2008, at 1:26 PM, Donald Woods wrote:Should we fix the following SNAPSHOT depends, which break offline builds in 2.1 or wait for 2.1.1? I can make the changes this afternoon...We won't be releasing with direct SNAPSHOT dependencies. These will all be updated as part of the release process. It may be that the release plugin could be used to detect improper, transitive SNAPSHOT dependencies. If you have specific proposals, would be happy to hear about them. --kevan
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
