Thanks, you beat me to it! I'll also update branches/2.0. Jarek
On Feb 7, 2008 12:15 PM, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just removed the bottom 3 in the 2.1 branch with Rev619508 based on > the changes you made in trunk. I'll start looking at pulling jtidy into > the local repo next. > > -Donald > > > Jarek Gawor wrote: > > I just performed a quick scan for direct snapshot dependencies in > > branches/2.1, here's the list (excluding jacc spec and > > ejbcontainer-tests): > > > > ./buildsupport/testsuite-maven-plugin/pom.xml: jtidy 8.0-SNAPSHOT > > ./plugins/monitoring/agent-jmx/pom.xml: xbean-naming 3.4-SNAPSHOT > > ./testsuite/pom.xml: maven-surefire-plugin 2.3-SNAPSHOT > > ./buildsupport/geronimo-maven-plugin/pom.xml surefire-api 2.1-SNAPSHOT > > > > Jarek > > > > On Feb 6, 2008 2:22 PM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Feb 6, 2008, at 1:26 PM, Donald Woods wrote: > >> > >>> Should we fix the following SNAPSHOT depends, which break offline > >>> builds in 2.1 or wait for 2.1.1? > >>> > >>> I can make the changes this afternoon... > >> We won't be releasing with direct SNAPSHOT dependencies. These will > >> all be updated as part of the release process. > >> > >> It may be that the release plugin could be used to detect improper, > >> transitive SNAPSHOT dependencies. > >> > >> If you have specific proposals, would be happy to hear about them. > >> > >> --kevan > >> > > >
