On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Jason Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was looking at transferring the J2G documentation over from 2.0 to 2.1and I > noticed that j2g is listed under tools rather than a migration > heading. Are we not going to have a Migration heading? I'd prefer to put > the tool under something more descriptive so that it really jumps out to a > user. Also, there were some migration sample documents that are now left > homeless. I guess I'm wondering if we should bring back the migration > heading. Thoughts anyone? > > I'm going to go ahead and create that and then move j2g into there. I can change it back if there are objections > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Lin Sun wrote: > > > Hi Hernan, I looked at the index you put out there and I think it is > > > very good! I cannot wait for these contents to be filled to > > > understand a bit more about these exciting 2.1 new features!! > > > > > > I think it'll be useful to add a FAQ or troubleshooting section. I > > > hope this can be the first place for a user to look at whenever they > > > run into some probs/exceptions. The content can grow based on the > > > questions we get on the user list. > > > > At some point we had a Troubleshooting section, maybe I forgot to bring > > the title over 2.1 doc. I just added the entry on the User's guide side. > > Ideally the Troubleshooting section should be a subset, an excerpt of > > some of the other areas already covered. I personally think of > > Troubleshooting section more like a convenience section. > > > > Agree with you that ultimately we want to address every single question > > from the user list. Hernan's view of the world!? if a user have an issue > > doing a task on Geronimo that means that A) G is not intuitive enough, B) we > > don't provide enough documentation on how to perform such task, C) we do > > have that info but it is a secret well kept and only a few know about it ;-) > > , D) all of the above. > > > > With that said, tackling an issue on the Troubleshooting section is a > > great start but we shouldn't stop there ;-) > > > > > > > > Also, I think the sample application and tutorial sections are a bit > > > confusion. First I look at the sample application and saw we only > > > have 2 down there but then I realized most of the samples are in the > > > tutorial section. > > > > The User's guide on the left is somewhat a carry over of topics from 2.0. > > For 2.1 I brought back the idea of the Developer's guide and put the > > Tutorials section there in contrast with Samples section from the User's > > guide. If you look at the Tutorials you'll see there is a different > > approach, it is more aligned with developing applications with GEP for > > instance, hence the location on the Developer's guide. > > > > Sample applications could end up being renamed to just Samples as it > > included some sample configurations as well. > > > > Either way, The doc is still on its early stages and this may change as > > we continue to develop the content. > > > > As usual, comments, new ideas and most definitively doc contributions > > are always welcome > > > > > > Cheers! > > Hernan > > > > > > > > Lin > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > >> Hey Kevan, Thanks for updating the doc. > > >> > > >> I thought it would be useful for the users to know what versions are > > we using for the components/projects that make Geronimo v2.1 > > >> For example, what version of Tomcat, Jetty, Derby, Axis... > > >> > > >> It would even help us to keep track of the components and versions, > > all in one place. > > >> > > >> Maybe this info could later on live on the Geronimo architecture > > section. Once we have the info it's easier to move. > > >> > > >> Cheers! > > >> Hernan > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Kevan Miller wrote: > > >> > > > >> > On Jan 28, 2008, at 11:48 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> Hi All, > > >> >> these are some of the topics I think we should cover for the 2.1 > > >> >> documentation. It is not a full list so we need your help to make > > it > > >> >> as complete as possible. Pls chime in with the topics you would > > like > > >> >> to see addressed in the documentation. > > >> >> > > >> >> * What's new in 2.1? > > >> >> ** New features > > >> >> ** Component versions > > >> >> ** Configuration changes > > >> >> ** Backwards compatibility > > >> > > > >> > Hernan, > > >> > I've fleshed out the "New Features" a bit in cwiki. Can you > > explain what > > >> > you meant by "Component versions"? > > >> > > > >> > --kevan > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > ~Jason Warner -- ~Jason Warner
