On Feb 22, 2008, at 7:20 PM, Vasily Zakharov wrote:
Sounds the best. :)
Well, detecting the Harmony VM is not a problem, the question is where
and at which stage that detection should take place and how should it
be reflected in further configuration process.
I guess the gshell launcher should figure this stuff out. It seems
like this is moving us from configuration back towards code which I'm
not too thrilled about. At least the script can be in groovy.
By the way, NamingProperties/namingFactoryUrlPkgs is also pretty clear
JDK-dependent thing and may be somehow bound to the same detection.
There's probably more we haven't found yet.
david jencks
Vasily
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 2:29 AM, Jacek Laskowski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Vasily Zakharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I suppose we could have, say, two security configuration, like
"jks-default" and "bks-default" and have the name of the one to
start
with in config-substitutions, right?
Or better yet - make it enabled automatically upon running
Geronimo on
Harmony. That'd be great.
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
