On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:25 PM, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess the gshell launcher should figure this stuff out. It seems > like this is moving us from configuration back towards code which I'm > not too thrilled about. At least the script can be in groovy. Can you elaborate more? How? Where should I look for answers? XML-less configuration as a groovy script is the best of two worlds - xml and java. You don't have to write ugly xml "esseys" yet it's as simple as xml. You can develop your apps with java and configure them with java-like language - groovy. I think it makes the configuration better than xml-based one. It's like maven's pom.xml in jruby, i.e. Apache Buildr. If we could have a buildr-like configuration layer for Geronimo I'd be more than happy. Jacek -- Jacek Laskowski http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
