I agree - great list. I welcome others to add more to the list, especially functions we don't feel work quite well.
After collecting everyone's thoughts, I plan to use a wiki page to keep track of the key functions that deserves testing with possible coverage by automation or manual testing. Thx, Lin On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Jarek Gawor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here are some specific areas that I think we should have more tests for: > > 1) Command line tools like deploy, client, jaxws-tools, etc. and their > gshell counterparts. > > 2) Deploying applications using the different methods or options: > using the command line tools, using the console, hot deploy, offline, > in-place, etc. > > 3) Plugin infrastructure: export a plugin, assemble a server, etc. > > In general, I think it would be a good exercise to come up with a list > of key features of Geronimo and make sure they are well covered by > tests. > > Jarek > > > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Lin Sun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am interested in collecting ideas on how we can improve user > > experience with the geronimo 2.x server, particularly, what type of > > testing we can do for each geronimo major release to identify probs > > and resolve them. > > > > I think it would be nice to have a set of test (either automated or > > manually) other than tck that we run to verify various functions in > > geronimo for each major release. Currently, we probably only run a > > very small amount of testing other than tck, our automated testing > > during the build and the few samples we have. > > > > One thought is to add more test samples. Seems to me people are > > trying different things with geronimo server and most of the stuff > > they tried are not covered by our samples. Any ideas what other > > samples may be good to work with geronimo? > > > > The other thought is to grow test cases from our JIRA system or users. > > Encourage folks to attach/contribute their test cases. > > > > Also, what g functions do folks think we need more testing? > > > > Thanks, Lin > > >
