I think we should be able to use Selenium IDE to record a trip
through these processes and then insert the recording into testcases
in the test suite. Anyone care to investigate?
thanks
david jencks
On Feb 29, 2008, at 6:42 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
That reminds me... Security realms portlet is broken yet again.
Editing a realm does not work :(
++Vamsi
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Shiva Kumar H R
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Some automated testcases which will make sure Admin Console
portlets are not broken:
(the ones I can think of immediately from a Deployment perspective:)
1) DB Manager
2) Database Pools
3) Security Realms
4) JMS Resources
5) Plan Creator
--
Thanks,
Shiva
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 2:14 AM, Lin Sun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I am interested in collecting ideas on how we can improve user
experience with the geronimo 2.x server, particularly, what type of
testing we can do for each geronimo major release to identify probs
and resolve them.
I think it would be nice to have a set of test (either automated or
manually) other than tck that we run to verify various functions in
geronimo for each major release. Currently, we probably only run a
very small amount of testing other than tck, our automated testing
during the build and the few samples we have.
One thought is to add more test samples. Seems to me people are
trying different things with geronimo server and most of the stuff
they tried are not covered by our samples. Any ideas what other
samples may be good to work with geronimo?
The other thought is to grow test cases from our JIRA system or users.
Encourage folks to attach/contribute their test cases.
Also, what g functions do folks think we need more testing?
Thanks, Lin
