Hmm...  I notice that only zip distributions are made available with other
eclipse plugin releases (like WTP, etc) too.  May be we should stick to only
zip files.  Thanks Donald.

++Vamsi

On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 6:59 PM, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> We need them in our server releases to properly preserve the
> directory/file attributes, keep the scripts marked as executable and to keep
> line endings on text files correct for Unix/Linux.
>
>
> -Donald
>
>
> Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 6:32 PM, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> >
> >    Not sure how creating a tar.gz makes it easier, given unzip is
> >    provided with most Linux distros (like RHEL, Fedora, SLED/SELS,
> >    openSUSE,  ....), on MacOSX and most Unix distros (though maybe as
> >    an optional package, like on AIX.)
> >
> > Makes me wonder why we have tar.gz distributions in our server
> > releases!!
> >
> > ++Vamsi
> >
> >
> >
> >    I'd prefer staying with zipfiles only.
> >
> >
> >    -Donald
> >
> >    Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
> >
> >        Hi Tim,
> >
> >        We should at least have a tar.gz distribution corresponding to
> >        geronimo-eclipse-plugin-xxx-deployable.zip so that it is easy
> >        for linux users who want to do a manual installation of GEP.
> >
> >        ++Vamsi
> >
> >        On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 6:57 PM, Tim McConnell
> >        <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>>
> >        wrote:
> >
> >           Hi Vamsi, I've opened a new feature JIRA to determine if it
> > makes
> >           sense to actually release a tar.gz artifact. As far as I
> >        know, the
> >           Eclipse update sites only handle zipfiles, so I'm not
> >        comfortable at
> >           this time releasing a tar.gz artifact for GEP 2.1.0.
> >        <http://2.1.0.> <http://2.1.0.>
> >
> >
> >           However, we shall determine the implications for the next GEP
> >           release, and if reasonable will do so. Thanks for the
> > suggestion
> >
> >           ----->
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-335
> >
> >
> >
> >           Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
> >
> >               To add on, I would love to see these tar.gz distributions
> >        in GEP
> >               2.1.0 release itself if adding these does not amount to a
> >        lot of
> >               work.
> >
> >               ++Vamsi
> >
> >               On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy
> >               <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> >               <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>>>
> > wrote:
> >
> >                  I don't remember if I had brought this up earlier, but
> >        wanted
> >               to...    Should we also include tar.gz distributions in
> > our
> >               Geronimo Eclipse
> >                  Plugin releases?
> >
> >                  ++Vamsi
> >
> >
> >                  On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:07 AM, Tim McConnell
> >                  <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> >               <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>>>
> >
> >               wrote:
> >
> >                      Discussion thread for the Geronimo Eclipse Plugin
> >        2.1.0 (RC1)
> >                      Release vote.....
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >           --    Thanks,
> >           Tim McConnell
> >
> >
> >
> >

Reply via email to