+1 for trunk too. I agree w/ Kevan that we should use versions for dojo. Maybe we could collect a list of portlets/pages that are using dojo and migrate each of them gradually to track the progress?
Lin On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 for trunk. > Can you also move the older versions out of trunk and into the > geronimo/plugins branch, so people can optionally install them if their app > still needs them? > > If you're wanting to also do this in branches/2.1, then we need to keep the > older version in the server images, so we don't break existing apps that may > need them and so we can warn users that we will be removing them in the next > release (2.2.) > > > -Donald > > > Joseph Leong wrote: >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> I've been tossing the idea around in my head of taking the initiative to >> upgrade the current items written in Dojo to 1.1.1, I know we still have >> some Dojo 0.4.3, which isn't supported anymore, in use and there has been >> vast improvements with their new Dijit package for widgets among many other >> items. Also, with some recently reported JIRAs about accessibility >> compatibility being an issue in these Dojo components we can make use of the >> a11y available in it. Overall, i also think we might also benefit a cleaner >> setup from streamlining our versions in terms of future development and >> maintenance as well. >> >> Although I haven't looked in complete detail in each of the AG Dojo >> pieces, i know that the 0.4.3 transition to 1.1.1 will take some work >> because the widget system has been separated out to it's own pieces (diji) >> and so simple work arounds will not do. That is, this will be a big block >> change rather than an incremental one. >> >> Does anyone have any thoughts - one way or the other on this undertaking? >> >> >> Thanks! >> Joseph Leong >
