I think I was one of the people asking for this to be reverted.
Just to clarify my position: I'm very much in favor of keeping the
functionality. I think it will help with some of the more obscure
classloader issues we've been hitting.
My suggestion to revert the change was more pragmatic to resolve two
issues:
1) new TCK failures reported by Jason
2) The implicit dependency on a new OpenEJB 3.1.x release
If we can resolve these 2 issues without reverting the change (or for #2
if it seems we need a new OpenEJB 3.1.x release for other reasons ...
like other TCK failures) then I'm very much in favor of keeping this
change.
Joe
David Jencks wrote:
Um, -1. I thought this was a great idea for 2.2. What's the problem
that leads you to revert it?
thanks
david jencks
On Nov 13, 2008, at 12:35 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: gdamour
Date: Thu Nov 13 00:35:05 2008
New Revision: 713680
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=713680&view=rev
Log:
Revert addition of private-classes element. Private classes can be
configured via scripts.
(GERONIMO-4403) Provide a mechanism to hide specific classes of a
configuration to all its children
<snip>
