It has been reworked much more that just the schema changes in the
standardization process. A lot of the service dynamics have changed,
there have been some fairly signification changes to type conversions
and property injection, a brand-new metadata API, new namespace handler
support, etc. Springsource hasn't even implemented some of the new
features yet, so this was far from a rubber-stamp effort.
Rick
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
RFC 124 is simply a ruberstamp around what Spring-DM provides. The
only real difference afaik are a few changes in the schema (mostly the
namespace and replacing "bean" by "component".
This does not remove the usefulness of it btw...
2009/3/17 Davanum Srinivas <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
Folks,
Any interest in support for RFC 124, "A Component Model for OSGi"?
http://www.osgi.org/download/osgi-4.2-early-draft.pdf
This is in addition to typical J2EE artifacts that we already support.
thanks,
dims
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
