Ok, my bad. I haven't followed closely the recent changes. The changes to the service dynamics look quite good actually. Thx for the info.
2009/3/17 Rick McGuire <[email protected]> > It has been reworked much more that just the schema changes in the > standardization process. A lot of the service dynamics have changed, there > have been some fairly signification changes to type conversions and property > injection, a brand-new metadata API, new namespace handler support, etc. > Springsource hasn't even implemented some of the new features yet, so this > was far from a rubber-stamp effort. > > Rick > > Guillaume Nodet wrote: > >> RFC 124 is simply a ruberstamp around what Spring-DM provides. The only >> real difference afaik are a few changes in the schema (mostly the namespace >> and replacing "bean" by "component". >> This does not remove the usefulness of it btw... >> >> 2009/3/17 Davanum Srinivas <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >> >> Folks, >> >> Any interest in support for RFC 124, "A Component Model for OSGi"? >> http://www.osgi.org/download/osgi-4.2-early-draft.pdf >> >> This is in addition to typical J2EE artifacts that we already support. >> >> thanks, >> dims >> >> -- >> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Guillaume Nodet >> ------------------------ >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >> ------------------------ >> Open Source SOA >> http://fusesource.com >> >> >> > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
