I agree that a 2.2 release would be nice to do to push out things already in trunk, before our users wait for too long. :-)
I'm reviewing the list of planned features [1] and current status [2] of 2.2. The latter [2] is more up-to-date. It would be good to make clear the areas that need some more work, so that people like me can jump in and help. Currently the major development items I see - 1. TCK, need a committer to do the job 2. MDB problems mentioned above 3. JMS portlets update mentioned above 4. Farm/cluster management (do we still want this in 2.2?) And of course there are also testing and doc work. Please complement and elaborate if necessary. [1] http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-22-release-roadmap.html [2] http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-22-release-status.html - Jack 2009/4/16 Kevan Miller <[email protected]> > > On Apr 15, 2009, at 11:29 AM, David Jencks wrote: > > >> On Apr 15, 2009, at 8:23 AM, Donald Woods wrote: >> >> Should we try reverting trunk (2.2) to use the same levels of OpenEJB and >>> Axis as in the recent 2.1.4 release, to see how close we would be to a >>> release that passes the TCK? That way, ActiveMQ 5.3-SNAPSHOT would be the >>> major difference left to resolve for a 2.2 release.... >>> >>> >> I think it would be more worthwhile to look into what is going wrong with >> the mdbs. David Blevins doesn't think any mdb-related openejb code changed >> and ActiveMQ broke at least one other thing since the last time mdbs worked >> well. >> > > I agree. FYI, I tried to get TCK fired up, but am having some issues. > David, have your run tck recently? Let's discuss on tck mailing list... > > What's the status of JMS resources and the Admin Console? Seem to recall > some missing function... > > --kevan >
