On Apr 15, 2009, at 10:33 PM, Jack Cai wrote:
I agree that a 2.2 release would be nice to do to push out things
already in trunk, before our users wait for too long. :-)
I'm reviewing the list of planned features [1] and current status
[2] of 2.2. The latter [2] is more up-to-date. It would be good to
make clear the areas that need some more work, so that people like
me can jump in and help. Currently the major development items I see -
1. TCK, need a committer to do the job
2. MDB problems mentioned above
3. JMS portlets update mentioned above
4. Farm/cluster management (do we still want this in 2.2?)
What's the problem with (4)?
I've been assuming that the classloader work Gianny and I have been
working on in my sandbox would get into 2.2. At the moment I think I
have the classloader framework more or less working and I'm going
through the plugins working on setting up the required jar
dependencies. Only some of them can be derived from maven
dependencies. This is turning out to be a somewhat slow process.
thanks
david jencks
And of course there are also testing and doc work.
Please complement and elaborate if necessary.
[1] http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-22-release-roadmap.html
[2] http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-22-release-status.html
- Jack
2009/4/16 Kevan Miller <[email protected]>
On Apr 15, 2009, at 11:29 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Apr 15, 2009, at 8:23 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Should we try reverting trunk (2.2) to use the same levels of
OpenEJB and Axis as in the recent 2.1.4 release, to see how close we
would be to a release that passes the TCK? That way, ActiveMQ 5.3-
SNAPSHOT would be the major difference left to resolve for a 2.2
release....
I think it would be more worthwhile to look into what is going wrong
with the mdbs. David Blevins doesn't think any mdb-related openejb
code changed and ActiveMQ broke at least one other thing since the
last time mdbs worked well.
I agree. FYI, I tried to get TCK fired up, but am having some
issues. David, have your run tck recently? Let's discuss on tck
mailing list...
What's the status of JMS resources and the Admin Console? Seem to
recall some missing function...
--kevan
