Shouldn't we include artifactAlias entries in the 2.2 server to preserve
existing application compatibility?
-Donald
[email protected] wrote:
Author: gawor
Date: Tue Jun 23 15:52:26 2009
New Revision: 787737
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=787737&view=rev
Log:
minor fix for samples: use jetty property
Modified:
geronimo/samples/trunk/samples/app-per-port/app-per-port-war1-jetty/pom.xml
Modified:
geronimo/samples/trunk/samples/app-per-port/app-per-port-war1-jetty/pom.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/samples/trunk/samples/app-per-port/app-per-port-war1-jetty/pom.xml?rev=787737&r1=787736&r2=787737&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- geronimo/samples/trunk/samples/app-per-port/app-per-port-war1-jetty/pom.xml
(original)
+++ geronimo/samples/trunk/samples/app-per-port/app-per-port-war1-jetty/pom.xml
Tue Jun 23 15:52:26 2009
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.geronimo.configs</groupId>
- <artifactId>jetty6-deployer</artifactId>
+ <artifactId>${jetty}-deployer</artifactId>
<version>${geronimoVersion}</version>
<type>car</type>
<scope>provided</scope>
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.geronimo.configs</groupId>
- <artifactId>jetty6</artifactId>
+ <artifactId>${jetty}</artifactId>
<version>${geronimoVersion}</version>
<type>car</type>
</dependency>
