I've worked on GERONIMO-4645, however I'm getting strange results from running the testsuite. When I look at build.log for a test bit I don't see errors but the console output claims a lot of bits failed.

So hopefully your automated tests won't have this problem and we can see how successful I was....


BTW my new code secures access to the ?wsdl for the web service. This seems like a good idea to me, WDYT?

thanks
david jencks

On Jun 25, 2009, at 8:58 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:

Based on running the testsuite yesterday and with fixes committed last
night I *think* we should be passing all tests on Tomcat and fail
enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests and webservices-testsuite/jaxws-tests
on Jetty. The webservices-testsuite/jaxws-tests fails because of
GERONIMO-4645. Not sure what's going on with
enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests.

Jarek

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Kevan Miller<[email protected]> wrote:
A search of emails shows that our last successful automated build of trunk was on May 26th. I know that there have been increasing frustration with these recent build issues. We seem to be closing in on getting these issues resolved. I built last night. I built successfully, last night, but had 7
testsuite failures -- 3 jetty, 4 tomcat.

I think it would do us a lot of good to have a concerted effort to get these
final issues resolved. Here are the test failures that I'm seeing:

3 common errors:

[INFO] The following tests failed:
[INFO]     * console-testsuite/advanced -
/Users/kevan/geronimo/server/trunk/testsuite/console-testsuite/ advanced/build.log
[INFO]     * enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests -
/Users/kevan/geronimo/server/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/ sec-tests/build.log
[INFO]     * webservices-testsuite/jaxws-tests -
/Users/kevan/geronimo/server/trunk/testsuite/webservices-testsuite/ jaxws-tests/build.log

1 Tomcat unique failure:

[INFO]     * web-testsuite/test-tomcat -
/Users/kevan/geronimo/server/trunk/testsuite/web-testsuite/test- tomcat/build.log

Is this consistent with what others are seeing?

--kevan

Reply via email to