I can't recreate the same console/advanced failure in my local machine. But I do find another console testsuite bug and filed a JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4720 (patch provided) The failure of enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests is related to "run-as" propagation from a servlet to another servlet. I'm looking into it and will provide a patch. On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:58 PM, Jarek Gawor <[email protected]> wrote: > Based on running the testsuite yesterday and with fixes committed last > night I *think* we should be passing all tests on Tomcat and fail > enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests and webservices-testsuite/jaxws-tests > on Jetty. The webservices-testsuite/jaxws-tests fails because of > GERONIMO-4645. Not sure what's going on with > enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests. > > Jarek > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Kevan Miller<[email protected]> > wrote: > > A search of emails shows that our last successful automated build of > trunk > > was on May 26th. I know that there have been increasing frustration with > > these recent build issues. We seem to be closing in on getting these > issues > > resolved. I built last night. I built successfully, last night, but had 7 > > testsuite failures -- 3 jetty, 4 tomcat. > > > > I think it would do us a lot of good to have a concerted effort to get > these > > final issues resolved. Here are the test failures that I'm seeing: > > > > 3 common errors: > > > > [INFO] The following tests failed: > > [INFO] * console-testsuite/advanced - > > > /Users/kevan/geronimo/server/trunk/testsuite/console-testsuite/advanced/build.log > > [INFO] * enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests - > > > /Users/kevan/geronimo/server/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests/build.log > > [INFO] * webservices-testsuite/jaxws-tests - > > > /Users/kevan/geronimo/server/trunk/testsuite/webservices-testsuite/jaxws-tests/build.log > > > > 1 Tomcat unique failure: > > > > [INFO] * web-testsuite/test-tomcat - > > > /Users/kevan/geronimo/server/trunk/testsuite/web-testsuite/test-tomcat/build.log > > > > Is this consistent with what others are seeing? > > > > --kevan > > > -- Shawn
