In this case, how do we do the tag? Just tag each invidiual vendor connector?
-Jack On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 3:23 PM, David Jencks <[email protected]>wrote: > > On Sep 21, 2009, at 8:39 PM, Rex Wang wrote: > > > > 2009/9/22 Jack Cai <[email protected]> > >> I think it's a good idea. A small problem that I see is currently all the >> vendor connectors have different version numbers. If we are going to put >> them under the same folder, shall we bump them to the same version? >> > So, if I update one vendor and change its version, I should update all the > vendors' version? > > > Since the vendor wrappers are not built together, there is no need for them > to have the same version. > > I was actually thinking further of: > - combining connector and connector-ra into a folder, perhaps "generic" > - removing the "vendors" folder and having generic, derby, db2, > postgres,.... next to one another. > > But even if we keep the vendors folder the versions don't have to be > related. > > thanks > david jencks > > > -Rex > > >> -Jack >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 4:41 AM, David Jencks <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> I've been irked for a while with the tranql svn organization and just bit >>> myself by not being careful enough to check the extent of the changes IDEA >>> made. I'd like to reorganize svn to make life clearer and simpler. >>> >>> 1. There are basically 2 projects, the query language itself which is not >>> really under active development at the moment, and the j2ca connector >>> framework which occasionally gets tweaked. I'd like to separate them. >>> >>> 2. We have a lot of foo/bar/trunk type directories. Our experience in >>> the geronimo specs projects is that maven 2 has no problem with separately >>> versioned subprojects all under trunk. >>> >>> So, I'd like to propose >>> >>> ql/ >>> +/branches >>> +/tags >>> +/trunk >>> >>> ra/ >>> +/branches >>> +/tags >>> +/trunk >>> >>> >>> Under ra/trunk we'd have connector, connector-ra, and the individual >>> vendor directories such as derby, oracle, etc. >>> >>> Thoughts? In particular does anyone think moving the existing tags will >>> cause problems? >>> >>> thanks >>> david jencks >>> >>> >> > >
