On Sep 22, 2009, at 9:44 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Flat structure like spec sounds good.
Would there also be a common tranql-parent POM, or would they all
use genesis?
I think a tranql-parent, like there is now. Tranql is not a geronimo
subproject, despite most of the discussion about it being here rather
than on the tranql dev list where it should be, so I'm not in favor of
using the geronimo parent pom for it.
thanks
david jencks
-Donald
David Jencks wrote:
On Sep 21, 2009, at 8:39 PM, Rex Wang wrote:
2009/9/22 Jack Cai <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]
>>
I think it's a good idea. A small problem that I see is currently
all the vendor connectors have different version numbers. If we
are going to put them under the same folder, shall we bump them
to
the same version?
So, if I update one vendor and change its version, I should update
all the vendors' version?
Since the vendor wrappers are not built together, there is no need
for them to have the same version.
I was actually thinking further of:
- combining connector and connector-ra into a folder, perhaps
"generic"
- removing the "vendors" folder and having generic, derby, db2,
postgres,.... next to one another.
But even if we keep the vendors folder the versions don't have to
be related.
thanks
david jencks
-Rex
-Jack
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 4:41 AM, David Jencks
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I've been irked for a while with the tranql svn organization
and just bit myself by not being careful enough to check the
extent of the changes IDEA made. I'd like to reorganize svn
to make life clearer and simpler.
1. There are basically 2 projects, the query language itself
which is not really under active development at the moment,
and the j2ca connector framework which occasionally gets
tweaked. I'd like to separate them.
2. We have a lot of foo/bar/trunk type directories. Our
experience in the geronimo specs projects is that maven 2 has
no problem with separately versioned subprojects all under
trunk.
So, I'd like to propose
ql/
+/branches
+/tags
+/trunk
ra/
+/branches
+/tags
+/trunk
Under ra/trunk we'd have connector, connector-ra, and the
individual vendor directories such as derby, oracle, etc.
Thoughts? In particular does anyone think moving the
existing
tags will cause problems?
thanks
david jencks
