+1 from me. I built the server and then ran the full tck successfully. ~Jason Warner
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Rick McGuire <[email protected]> wrote: > I was sort of waiting for a decision on whether those couple of problems > raised in the discuss thread were blockers or not. I guess they're not, so > here's my +1 too. > > Rick > > Kevan Miller wrote: > >> Here's my +1. >> I reviewed the source and binaries in >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/ >> >> --kevan >> >> On Dec 8, 2009, at 2:56 AM, David Jencks wrote: >> >> I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using the >>> maven-release-plugin. >>> >>> This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal. >>> >>> See the jira issues here: >>> >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965< >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965 >>> > >>> >>> Staged to >>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/< >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024 >>> > >>> >>> >>> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives >>> >>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz< >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz >>> > >>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip< >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip >>> > >>> >>> >>> If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something >>> plausible builds from them. >>> >>> >>> [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door >>> [ ] 0 no opinion >>> [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why) >>> >>> Many thanks >>> david jencks >>> >> >> >
