You can compare it to the 2.1.4 files located here for reference:
http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/2.1.4/
I took a quick look. Things looked fairly similar to what we included
in previous releases. Missing from your setup were the LICENSE, NOTICE,
and RELEASE_NOTES. I'm not sure how critical the LICENSE & NOTICE are
... but it doesn't hurt to include them. I think the RELEASE_NOTES are
important because they are typically included in a reference from the
download page. I know I sound like a broken record here but I think
this is really important with 2.2 because the RELEASE_NOTES are not
included in the assembly images. I would personally recommend to
include the README in this location as well with a link from the
download page for similar reasons with 2.2.
I thought I had a script I used for previous release but I can't find it
at the moment.
One more thing - At one time there were storage issues on the dist
server and so we were asked to keep just the most important releases at
that location and update all other references on the download pages to
the archive. Now that 2.2 is being added we should consider removing
2.1.3 leaving only 2.2 and 2.1.4.
Joe
David Jencks wrote:
I've promoted the staging repo and started working on the other bits.
I've tried to figure out what needs to go to
the /www/www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/
<http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/> and set up
http://people.apache.org/~djencks/2.2/
with what I think needs to go there. Could this get some review perhaps
from people who have done releases before?
Also, anyone have a better way of collecting this stuff? I did this:
123 19:32 wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2
127 19:33 cp
repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/*source-release*
../2.2/
128 19:35 wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-framework/2.2/
129 19:36 cp
repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-framework/2.2/*bin.*
../2.2/
130 19:37 wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-jetty7-javaee5/2.2/
131 19:38 cp
repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-jetty7-javaee5/2.2/*bin.*
../2.2/
132 19:38 wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-jetty7-minimal/2.2/
133 19:39 cp
repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-jetty7-minimal/2.2/*bin.*
../2.2/
134 19:40 wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5/2.2/
135 19:40 cp
repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5/2.2/*bin.*
../2.2/
136 19:41 wget --recursive --level=1 --no-check-certificate
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-minimal/2.2/
137 19:42 cp
repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-minimal/2.2/*bin.*
../2.2/
thanks
david jencks
On Dec 13, 2009, at 12:47 AM, David Jencks wrote:
I've waited long enough.
We've verified that the binaries pass the javaee 5 and jaspic servlet
profile tcks.
+1: kevan, rmcguire, jwarner, jdmchugh, djencks, dwoods, jbohn,
linsun (all pmc)
no other votes.
I'll promote the staging repo and try to figure out what to do for the
release download page.
thanks
david jencks
On Dec 7, 2009, at 11:56 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using
the maven-release-plugin.
This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a warning removal.
See the jira issues here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&styleName=Html&version=12312965>
Staged to
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/
<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024>
The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz
<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.tar.gz>
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip
<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-024/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2/geronimo-2.2-source-release.zip>
If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something
plausible builds from them.
[ ] +1 about time to push this out the door
[ ] 0 no opinion
[ ] -1 not this one (please explain why)
Many thanks
david jencks
