Thanks for your comments. On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Juergen Weber <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi, > > people who'd use Geronimo as a JEE application server (the vast majority, > as > I see it) might not want to be bothered by OSGI dialogues. > So, I'd vote for > 3. hide all OSGI features from the console until the user explicitely wants > to see them by > [x] show OSGI features > I was thinking that If we could release these OSGi related portlets as geronimo plugins, users can enable the features by installing those plugins. Otherwise, Geronimo is still a Java EE application server, even though it's already OSGi-based. Any comments? Jeff > Juergen > > > RunHua Chi wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > With the progress of OSGi implementation for G3.0, I think we can start > > thinking about which features we will provide to users via Admin Console. > > IMHO, there would be 2 options to present the new features: > > 1. Use an independent section for OSGi part and keep Java EE parts as > > is. > > 2. Integrate OSGi features into existing portlets > > > > If we choose option 1, I can think of following new portlets to be > > appended > > to the navigation item(might be more, you are welcome to append the > list): > > 1.a. OSGi Framework information; > > 1.b. Bundle management, which is only used to install/uninstall > > bundles; > > 1.c. Blueprint management, which Rex and Delos are working on, but > > resides in Debug Views section temporarily. > > 1.c. OBR management, which is used to Add/Browse repositories and > > install bundles from repos. > > > > Other than the portlets above, there are 2 more features: User Admin and > > Log > > Service, which can be integrated with existing portlets like Security&Log > > viewers. > > > > I can see a lot of overlaps between Java EE and OSGi related portlets, it > > would be nice to have them consolidated as one, for example； > > Bundle management v.s Deploy New > > OBR management v.s Install Plugins from repositories > > OSGi Framework info v.s Java System Info > > > > But thinking of the resource available, I'd like to suggest we choose > > option > > 1 for G3.0 console. > > > > Any comments? > > > > > > Jeff C > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/OSGi-features-on-Admin-Console-tp27319741s134p27322871.html > Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
