If there is no objection, I'd like to file a JIRA to track the request today or tomorrow.
Jeff C On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:25 AM, chi runhua <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for your comments. > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Juergen Weber <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> >> people who'd use Geronimo as a JEE application server (the vast majority, >> as >> I see it) might not want to be bothered by OSGI dialogues. >> So, I'd vote for >> 3. hide all OSGI features from the console until the user explicitely >> wants >> to see them by >> [x] show OSGI features >> > > I was thinking that If we could release these OSGi related portlets as > geronimo plugins, users can enable the features by installing those > plugins. > > Otherwise, Geronimo is still a Java EE application server, even though it's > already OSGi-based. > > Any comments? > > Jeff > > >> Juergen >> >> >> RunHua Chi wrote: >> > >> > Hi all, >> > >> > With the progress of OSGi implementation for G3.0, I think we can start >> > thinking about which features we will provide to users via Admin >> Console. >> > IMHO, there would be 2 options to present the new features: >> > 1. Use an independent section for OSGi part and keep Java EE parts >> as >> > is. >> > 2. Integrate OSGi features into existing portlets >> > >> > If we choose option 1, I can think of following new portlets to be >> > appended >> > to the navigation item(might be more, you are welcome to append the >> list): >> > 1.a. OSGi Framework information; >> > 1.b. Bundle management, which is only used to install/uninstall >> > bundles; >> > 1.c. Blueprint management, which Rex and Delos are working on, but >> > resides in Debug Views section temporarily. >> > 1.c. OBR management, which is used to Add/Browse repositories and >> > install bundles from repos. >> > >> > Other than the portlets above, there are 2 more features: User Admin and >> > Log >> > Service, which can be integrated with existing portlets like >> Security&Log >> > viewers. >> > >> > I can see a lot of overlaps between Java EE and OSGi related portlets, >> it >> > would be nice to have them consolidated as one, for example； >> > Bundle management v.s Deploy New >> > OBR management v.s Install Plugins from repositories >> > OSGi Framework info v.s Java System Info >> > >> > But thinking of the resource available, I'd like to suggest we choose >> > option >> > 1 for G3.0 console. >> > >> > Any comments? >> > >> > >> > Jeff C >> > >> > >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://old.nabble.com/OSGi-features-on-Admin-Console-tp27319741s134p27322871.html >> Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >
