On Apr 26, 2010, at 5:51 PM, David Jencks wrote: > Kevan, > > I've talked with Brian Fox and he says the checksums are recalculated when a > staging repo is promoted. So, fixing them in the staging repo would have no > lasting effect. > > Based on this would you be interested in revising your -1?
Heh. So there's no point in validating the checksums to begin with? :) I'm ok assuming that the checksum issue will be fixed during the release process. Given the fact that I'm happy with the artifacts and signature -- here's my +1 --kevan > > thanks > david jencks > > On Apr 25, 2010, at 4:27 PM, David Jencks wrote: > >> The bad checksums seem to be because somehow maven 2.2.0 got installed on my >> system. I have no idea why, but it's known to produce bad checksums. >> >> I'll try to contact e.g. brian fox to see what we can do about them. I >> think usually what has happened in the past is to promote, then fix, but >> maybe they can be fixed before promotion. >> >> thanks >> david jencks >> >> On Apr 25, 2010, at 12:25 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: >> >>> I'm seeing one blocker issue -- all of the checksums that I have downloaded >>> do not match the corresponding checksums that I compute. For instance: >>> >>> $ md5sum yoko-1.1-source-release.tar.gz ; cat >>> yoko-1.1-source-release.tar.gz.md5 >>> md5sum yoko-1.1-source-release.tar.gz ; cat >>> yoko-1.1-source-release.tar.gz.md5 >>> f9283f77a4dfbfa483a085fb073bc3f7 yoko-1.1-source-release.tar.gz >>> e849d7acbeafe1726252619e651f534c >>> >>> Until these are fixed, I'm -1 for the release. I'm ok with the vote >>> proceeding, if these can be fixed in place (it doesn't look like the >>> release artifacts need to be updated, just the checksums). >>> >>> There's one minor issue in the NOTICE file. The COPYRIGHT date has not been >>> updated: >>> >>> Copyright 1999-2008 The Apache Software Foundation >>> >>> Our convention has been to keep the last year up to date, upon the release. >>> This is not a requirement... >>> >>> --kevan >>> >>> >>> On Apr 22, 2010, at 10:38 PM, David Jencks wrote: >>> >>>> Please vote on yoko 1.1, yoko with osgi support. It works enough so an >>>> ORB and HandleDelegate can be bound in jndi. There are no >>>> non-classloading related code changes from previous yoko releases. >>>> >>>> Staging repo: >>>> >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-013/ >>>> >>>> Tag: >>>> >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/yoko/tags/yoko-1.1/ >>> >> >
