I don't know what happened but I see a bunch of "checksum failed" messages from maven when downloading yoko artifacts. I also downloaded some of these artifacts (without maven) and compared checksums and they do NOT match.
Jarek On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Kevan Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Apr 26, 2010, at 5:51 PM, David Jencks wrote: > >> Kevan, >> >> I've talked with Brian Fox and he says the checksums are recalculated when a >> staging repo is promoted. So, fixing them in the staging repo would have no >> lasting effect. >> >> Based on this would you be interested in revising your -1? > > Heh. So there's no point in validating the checksums to begin with? :) > > I'm ok assuming that the checksum issue will be fixed during the release > process. Given the fact that I'm happy with the artifacts and signature -- > here's my +1 > > --kevan > >> >> thanks >> david jencks >> >> On Apr 25, 2010, at 4:27 PM, David Jencks wrote: >> >>> The bad checksums seem to be because somehow maven 2.2.0 got installed on >>> my system. I have no idea why, but it's known to produce bad checksums. >>> >>> I'll try to contact e.g. brian fox to see what we can do about them. I >>> think usually what has happened in the past is to promote, then fix, but >>> maybe they can be fixed before promotion. >>> >>> thanks >>> david jencks >>> >>> On Apr 25, 2010, at 12:25 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: >>> >>>> I'm seeing one blocker issue -- all of the checksums that I have >>>> downloaded do not match the corresponding checksums that I compute. For >>>> instance: >>>> >>>> $ md5sum yoko-1.1-source-release.tar.gz ; cat >>>> yoko-1.1-source-release.tar.gz.md5 >>>> md5sum yoko-1.1-source-release.tar.gz ; cat >>>> yoko-1.1-source-release.tar.gz.md5 >>>> f9283f77a4dfbfa483a085fb073bc3f7 yoko-1.1-source-release.tar.gz >>>> e849d7acbeafe1726252619e651f534c >>>> >>>> Until these are fixed, I'm -1 for the release. I'm ok with the vote >>>> proceeding, if these can be fixed in place (it doesn't look like the >>>> release artifacts need to be updated, just the checksums). >>>> >>>> There's one minor issue in the NOTICE file. The COPYRIGHT date has not >>>> been updated: >>>> >>>> Copyright 1999-2008 The Apache Software Foundation >>>> >>>> Our convention has been to keep the last year up to date, upon the >>>> release. This is not a requirement... >>>> >>>> --kevan >>>> >>>> >>>> On Apr 22, 2010, at 10:38 PM, David Jencks wrote: >>>> >>>>> Please vote on yoko 1.1, yoko with osgi support. It works enough so an >>>>> ORB and HandleDelegate can be bound in jndi. There are no >>>>> non-classloading related code changes from previous yoko releases. >>>>> >>>>> Staging repo: >>>>> >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-013/ >>>>> >>>>> Tag: >>>>> >>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/yoko/tags/yoko-1.1/ >>>> >>> >> > >
