Ah... missed the bootstrap build step :D .  The build seems to run fine now.
Will post again if it fails. Thanks Donald.

On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Donald Woods <dwo...@apache.org> wrote:

> Those versions on Mac....
>
> What problem did you encounter?  Did you run the bootstrap build first?
> mvn install -Dstage=bootstrap
> mvn install
>
>
> -Donald
>
>
> On 6/11/10 12:33 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
> > Donald,
> >
> > I am unable to build the tag starting with an empty maven repo. I tried
> > with Maven-2.2.1 as well as Maven-3.0-beta1. I am using Sun JDK
> > 1.6.0_20.  Which version of Sun JDK and Maven have you used to build the
> > tag?
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Donald Woods <dwo...@apache.org
> > <mailto:dwo...@apache.org>> wrote:
> >
> >     +1  as I think the below issues are acceptable for a milestone
> release.
> >
> >     Was able to build the tag and start the Tomcat Java EE 6 server.
> >
> >
> >     -Donald
> >
> >
> >     On 6/10/10 4:29 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> >     > +0.5
> >     >
> >     > M1 is affected by GERONIMO-5336. All services will most likely bind
> to
> >     > the local loopback device instead of all network devices so you
> won't
> >     > be able to access the console, etc. remotely. That can be fixed by
> >     > setting the ServerHostname property to 0.0.0.0 in
> >     > var/config/config-substitutions.properties file and also changing
> the
> >     > following in var/config/config.xml:
> >     >
> >     > <attribute name="ServerUrl">tcp://${ServerHostname}:${ActiveMQPort
> +
> >     > PortOffset}</attribute>
> >     >
> >     > to
> >     >
> >     > <attribute name="ServerUrl">tcp://localhost:${ActiveMQPort +
> >     > PortOffset}</attribute>
> >     >
> >     > Otherwise, without the second change an exception will be generated
> at
> >     > server startup by the activemq plugin.
> >     >
> >     > M1 also seems to be affected by GERONIMO-5334. But I only see that
> >     > error from time to time.
> >     >
> >     > Jarek
> >     >
> >     > On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Rick McGuire <rick...@gmail.com
> >     <mailto:rick...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >     >> A new 3.0-M1 release candidate is ready for review.  The LICENSE
> >     problem has
> >     >> been corrected and the missed testsuite updates that Jarek
> >     noticed have been
> >     >> included.
> >     >>
> >     >> See the JIRA issues here:
> >     >>
> >     >>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090&styleName=Text&projectId=10220
> >     <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090&styleName=Text&projectId=10220
> >
> >     >>
> >     >> Staged to
> >     >>
> >     >>
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/
> >     >>
> >     >> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
> >     >>
> >     >>
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.zip
> >     >>
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.tar.gz
> >     >>
> >     >> If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure
> something
> >     >> plausible builds from them.
> >     >>
> >     >> The voting will be open a minimum of 72 hours.
> >     >>
> >     >> [  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
> >     >> [  ]  0 no opinion
> >     >> [  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)
> >     >>
> >     >> Rick
> >     >>
> >     >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Vamsi
>



-- 
Vamsi

Reply via email to