On Jun 17, 2010, at 11:33 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: > On 6/17/2010 11:20 AM, Donald Woods wrote: >> I'd be fine with requiring Java SE 6 for 2.2.1 and follow-on releases. >> > > Is that even allowed by the Java EE 5 certification rules?
Yes, but I don't think it really matters. I don't think we have any real motivation to move to Java 6 -- there aren't Java 6 features that we're planning on taking advantage of... It's simply someone "built" on Java 6 and found that they had problems subsequently "running" on Java 5. IMO, we should be building on Java 5 (maintaining support for Java 5), if users want to run on Java 6, that's fine... --kevan
