On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Shawn Jiang <[email protected]> wrote:
> Right, stay with SE 5. But document that there might be some potential > issue(e.g. webservice problems caused by SE 6 bundled saaj and jaxb) when > working with SE 6. > > So far, we have document for G2.2 at [1] as below: Geronimo v2.2 can be built on Java SE 6 and provide support to JAXB/JAX-WS version2 implementation, and its assemblies also supports Java 5 and 6 run-time environments. Plan to update as: Geronimo v2.2 can be built on Java SE 6 and provide support to JAXB/JAX-WS version2 implementation, and its assemblies also supports Java 5 and 6 run-time environments. Note that server assemblies are built based on Java 5 SDK by default, there will be some potential issues with web services features especially when using SAAJ and JAXB components at Java 6 run-time environment. Any comments? [1]. https://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC22/new-features-and-enhancements.html#Newfeaturesandenhancements-JavaSE6support Jeff > > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 4:13 AM, Donald Woods <[email protected]> wrote: > >> OK, just found GERONIMO-5369 and it turns out not to be an issue, so >> lets stay with SE 5 for 2.2. >> >> >> -Donald >> >> >> On 6/17/10 12:26 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: >> > >> > On Jun 17, 2010, at 11:33 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: >> > >> >> On 6/17/2010 11:20 AM, Donald Woods wrote: >> >>> I'd be fine with requiring Java SE 6 for 2.2.1 and follow-on releases. >> >>> >> >> >> >> Is that even allowed by the Java EE 5 certification rules? >> > >> > Yes, but I don't think it really matters. I don't think we have any real >> motivation to move to Java 6 -- there aren't Java 6 features that we're >> planning on taking advantage of... It's simply someone "built" on Java 6 and >> found that they had problems subsequently "running" on Java 5. >> > >> > IMO, we should be building on Java 5 (maintaining support for Java 5), >> if users want to run on Java 6, that's fine... >> > >> > --kevan >> > > > > -- > Shawn >
