I am thinking that we should build it by jdk 1.5. 2010/9/14 Kevan Miller <[email protected]>
> Rick, > Source, signature, checksum, build -- all look good. Here's my +1. > > One note, your source release is: > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/org/apache/geronimo/javamail/geronimo-javamail_1.4/1.8.2/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8.2-source-release.tar.gz > or > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/org/apache/geronimo/javamail/geronimo-javamail_1.4/1.8.2/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8.2-source-release.zip > > Your note refers to the source jars that are, IMO, not appropriate as > release artifacts. The above artifact (tar.gz) is what I've reviewed and am > voting on. > > --kevan > > > On Sep 10, 2010, at 8:04 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: > > > This is a bug fix release to fix a problem with the javamail smtp > provider including the BCC recipients as a header in sent messages. The > JIRA in question is > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5587 > > > > This is a vote for the javamail providers and combined mail jar. This > fix did not require an update to the javamail specs. . > > > > The 2 components up for vote are: > > > > > org/apache/geronimo/javamail/geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail/1.8.2/geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail-1.8.2-sources.jar > > > org/apache/geronimo/javamail/geronimo-javamail_1.4_provider/1.8.2/geronimo-javamail_1.4_provider-1.8.2-sources.jar > > > > from the staging repository at: > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/ > > > > The source repo is: > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8.2/ > > > > Vote will be open for 72 hours. > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > > > > Rick > > > > -- Ivan
