I agree with Ivan. We should use JDK1.5 to build the binaries.

On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Ivan <xhh...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I am thinking that we should build it by jdk 1.5.
>
> 2010/9/14 Kevan Miller <kevan.mil...@gmail.com>
>
> Rick,
>> Source, signature, checksum, build -- all look good.  Here's my +1.
>>
>> One note, your source release is:
>>
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/org/apache/geronimo/javamail/geronimo-javamail_1.4/1.8.2/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8.2-source-release.tar.gz
>> or
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/org/apache/geronimo/javamail/geronimo-javamail_1.4/1.8.2/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8.2-source-release.zip
>>
>> Your note refers to the source jars that are, IMO, not appropriate as
>> release artifacts. The above artifact (tar.gz) is what I've reviewed and am
>> voting on.
>>
>> --kevan
>>
>>
>> On Sep 10, 2010, at 8:04 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>>
>> > This is a bug fix release to fix a problem with the javamail smtp
>> provider including the BCC recipients as a header in sent messages.  The
>> JIRA in question is
>> >
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5587
>> >
>> > This is a vote for the javamail providers and combined mail jar.  This
>> fix did not require an update to the javamail specs. .
>> >
>> > The 2 components up for vote are:
>> >
>> >
>> org/apache/geronimo/javamail/geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail/1.8.2/geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail-1.8.2-sources.jar
>> >
>> org/apache/geronimo/javamail/geronimo-javamail_1.4_provider/1.8.2/geronimo-javamail_1.4_provider-1.8.2-sources.jar
>> >
>> > from the staging repository at:
>> >
>> >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/
>> >
>> > The source repo is:
>> >
>> >
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8.2/
>> >
>> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>> >
>> > [ ] +1  approve
>> > [ ] +0  no opinion
>> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>> >
>> >
>> > Rick
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Ivan
>



-- 
Vamsi

Reply via email to