On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Forrest Xia <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Forrest Xia <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Jarek Gawor <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> How are things with Jetty? Some user emails gave me an impression that >>> things don't look too good. If things with Jetty are looking bad then >>> we should either consider dropping it from the release or delaying the >>> release until we get it in shape. >>> >> Some status consolidation here about Jetty assembly in 3.0 branch: >> 1. BV and DI tck all pass for jetty8-javaee6 assembly >> 2. JCDI and full profile execution just triggered, we will see some >> results after two days. >> > JCDI tck against jetty8-javaee6 failed most of the cases. > Jetty assembly results: Tests 37068 Passed 23616 Failed 13452 https://phoebe.apache.org:9443/jobs/artifacts/201/2185537/Geronimo_3_0_jetty_Test_Results/non-passing-overview.html > >>> Jarek >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Forrest Xia <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > All, >>> > >>> > Tried to update the status page for G 3.0.0 release, please review >>> them and >>> > comment on >>> > >>> > >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Geronimo+3.0.0+Release+Status >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Thanks! >>> > >>> > Regards, Forrest >>> > >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Thanks! >> >> Regards, Forrest >> >> > > > -- > Thanks! > > Regards, Forrest > > -- Thanks! Regards, Forrest
