Drop jetty release makes sense. +1 from my side. On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Forrest Xia <[email protected]> wrote:
> Any more thoughts on droping jetty assembly from 3.0.0 release? or I will > go ahead to make the change and roll out 3.0.0 release... > > > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Shawn Jiang <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 to drop Jetty release from 3.0.0 release for now. >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Forrest Xia <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Echo Jarek's response here in dev list again: >>> >>> So it looks like we have quite a bit of failures on Jetty. I guess we >>> either have to drop it from the release (if we want to release soon) >>> or try to fix it and delay the release. Thoughts? >>> >>> My thought is to drop jetty release for 3.0.0 and roll out tomcat >>> assembly asap. Any more thoughts about 3.0.0 release?? >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Forrest Xia <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Kevan Miller >>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Jun 22, 2012, at 9:20 AM, Forrest Xia wrote: >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Forrest Xia <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Forrest Xia <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Jarek Gawor <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > How are things with Jetty? Some user emails gave me an impression >>>>> that >>>>> > things don't look too good. If things with Jetty are looking bad then >>>>> > we should either consider dropping it from the release or delaying >>>>> the >>>>> > release until we get it in shape. >>>>> > Some status consolidation here about Jetty assembly in 3.0 branch: >>>>> > 1. BV and DI tck all pass for jetty8-javaee6 assembly >>>>> > 2. JCDI and full profile execution just triggered, we will see some >>>>> results after two days. >>>>> > JCDI tck against jetty8-javaee6 failed most of the cases. >>>>> > Jetty assembly results: >>>>> > Tests 37068 >>>>> > Passed 23616 >>>>> > Failed 13452 >>>>> >>>>> Forrest -- too much TCK information on a public list. TCK terms may be >>>>> improving in the future. However, until then, we should not talk about >>>>> test >>>>> names, numbers of tests, etc. >>>>> >>>> OK, got it, sorry for that. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> --kevan >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> Regards, Forrest >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Regards, Forrest >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Shawn >> > > > > -- > Thanks! > > Regards, Forrest > > -- viola Apache Geronimo
