Yes, that's another topic the community needs to discuss. For Geronimo 1.0 branch and 2.0 branch. There's no much users and there's no activities in community for quite a time. I think it's also the good time to discuss if we need to drop 1.0 and 2.0 support officially.
If the community can reach an agreement, and then we can drop the 1.0 and 2.0 support from GEP directly. On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Ivan <[email protected]> wrote: > Agree that it is better to have one GEP, which supports all the versions. > But I am thinking that we may need to consider more for the GEP version > numbers. In the past, I guess that, while users installed Geronimo 2.2.0, > from the version, they may know that GEP 2.2.0 will include the support for > the same server version. > > Actually, I am thinking that whether we still need to keep those old > server supports, I remembered that some GEP developers have complained for > maintain those old adapters. > > > 2012/7/13 Forrest Xia <[email protected]> > >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Johannes Weberhofer < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Dear John! >>> >>> I'll like to bring this into discussion again: >>> >>> Is it really necessary, to have so many GEP versions in parallel? >>> Shouldn't there be always one version which supports all current Geronimo >>> versions? >>> >>> Currently, there is eg. GEP_2.1.7 (when I'm right), which supports >>> G<2.1.7; GEP_2.2 supports G=2.2 and G<2.1.2 (or similar) etc. >>> >>> I think, that's confusing for someone who likes to install the GEP >>> plugins. I'd recomment to remove all the older versions, and have only one >>> recent version. 3.0.0 could support everything up to 3.0.0; in case a >>> G2.2.1 will be released, there could be a new GEP 3.0.0.1, which adds >>> support to that... >>> >> This is a good idea! >> >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Johannes >>> >>> Am Thu Jul 12 10:31:25 2012 schrieb Yi Xiao: >>> >>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> As Geronimo 3.0.0 is released, I think it's the time for releasing >>>> GEP3.0.0 >>>> >>>> I've create the branch https://svn.apache.org/repos/** >>>> asf/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-**plugin/branches/3.0<https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/branches/3.0>to >>>> track the code for release, the base line is @1344906 in trunk, >>>> I didn't create the branch from the latest revision as >>>> GERONIMODEVTOOLS-796 and GERONIMODEVTOOLS-791 also need the server >>>> supports, but Geronimo3.0.0 has been released. >>>> >>>> However, I will merge other important jiras after 796 into GEP3.0.0 for >>>> better user experience and then follow the release process. >>>> >>>> Have any other suggestions? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Best regards! >>>> >>>> >>>> John Xiao >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> Johannes Weberhofer >>> Weberhofer GmbH, Austria, Vienna >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Thanks! >> >> Regards, Forrest >> >> > > > -- > Ivan > -- Shawn
