thats a legal thingy with the JCP rules. We must not release this as 'final' version if the spec is only a MR. Thus the next best we can do is to add the MR2 to the version.
LieGrue, strub >________________________________ > From: Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> >To: Mark Struberg <[email protected]>; [email protected] >Sent: Friday, 19 April 2013, 22:10 >Subject: Re: commons-annotation-1.2.MR2 > > > >No app/lib will ise mr2 IMO so i'd remove it >Le 19 avr. 2013 20:09, "Mark Struberg" <[email protected]> a écrit : > >folks, what is the correct bundle version for a MR2 release? >> >> >> <Export-Package>javax.annotation*;version=1.2.MR2</Export-Package> >> >>is this ok from an OSGi perspective? Or should we ditch the 'MR2' anyway and >>just keep it in the version for now? >> >> >> >>LieGrue, >>strub >> >> >> >>----- Original Message ----- >>> From: Kevan Miller <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected]; Mark Struberg <[email protected]> >>> Cc: >>> Sent: Tuesday, 16 April 2013, 21:40 >>> Subject: Re: commons-annotation-1.2.MR2 >>> >>> >>> On Apr 16, 2013, at 3:32 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> hi folks! >>>> >>>> In CDI and EJB for EE7 we need a few things from >>> commons-annotation-1.2.MR2. >>>> Most important is the new javax.annotation.Priority annotation. >>>> >>>> Should I just svn copy the geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec module and add the >>> missing annotations? >>> >>> Hi Mark, >>> Are you proposing that we svn copy geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec to a new >>> geronimo-annotation_1.2_spec and start adding new features defined by the >>> new >>> spec? >>> >>> If so, then yes. Sounds good to me. Thanks! >>> >>> --kevan >>> >> > >
