I'm not sure what you're saying. There are plenty of specs we've released that are final MRx's
IIRC we've dealt with the "don't claim it's final" by having a SNAPSHOT maven version and a disclaimer somewhere and, well, not releasing it. The micro version of an osgi version has to be numeric, here's the grammar: version ::= major( '.' minor ( '.' micro ( '.' qualifier )? )? )? major ::= number minor ::=number micro ::=number qualifier ::= ( alphanum | ’_’ | '-' )+ so MR2 won't work as the micro version. For now I'd recommend 1.2.1. I'll try to find out what the discussion on osgi versions for javaee packages ended up with as a recommendation. thanks david jencks On Apr 19, 2013, at 11:19 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: > thats a legal thingy with the JCP rules. > > We must not release this as 'final' version if the spec is only a MR. Thus > the next best we can do is to add the MR2 to the version. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > >> ________________________________ >> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> >> To: Mark Struberg <[email protected]>; [email protected] >> Sent: Friday, 19 April 2013, 22:10 >> Subject: Re: commons-annotation-1.2.MR2 >> >> >> >> No app/lib will ise mr2 IMO so i'd remove it >> Le 19 avr. 2013 20:09, "Mark Struberg" <[email protected]> a écrit : >> >> folks, what is the correct bundle version for a MR2 release? >>> >>> >>> <Export-Package>javax.annotation*;version=1.2.MR2</Export-Package> >>> >>> is this ok from an OSGi perspective? Or should we ditch the 'MR2' anyway >>> and just keep it in the version for now? >>> >>> >>> >>> LieGrue, >>> strub >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: Kevan Miller <[email protected]> >>>> To: [email protected]; Mark Struberg <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: >>>> Sent: Tuesday, 16 April 2013, 21:40 >>>> Subject: Re: commons-annotation-1.2.MR2 >>>> >>>> >>>> On Apr 16, 2013, at 3:32 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> hi folks! >>>>> >>>>> In CDI and EJB for EE7 we need a few things from >>>> commons-annotation-1.2.MR2. >>>>> Most important is the new javax.annotation.Priority annotation. >>>>> >>>>> Should I just svn copy the geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec module and add >>>>> the >>>> missing annotations? >>>> >>>> Hi Mark, >>>> Are you proposing that we svn copy geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec to a new >>>> geronimo-annotation_1.2_spec and start adding new features defined by the >>>> new >>>> spec? >>>> >>>> If so, then yes. Sounds good to me. Thanks! >>>> >>>> --kevan >>>> >>> >> >>
