for javamail we need both
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2015-02-04 12:51 GMT+01:00 Hendrik Dev <[email protected]>: > do we plan to release javamail alpha specs only or specs and impl? i > ll vote for both > > On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau > <[email protected]> wrote: >> 1.8.0 sounds good. If anyone with a setup to run TCKs can do it it >> would be awesome otherwise we can do a 1.8.0-alpha-1 without this >> check. >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau >> http://www.tomitribe.com >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >> https://github.com/rmannibucau >> >> >> 2014-12-03 13:59 GMT+01:00 Hendrik Dev <[email protected]>: >>> Hi Devs, >>> >>> last geronimo javamail 1.4 spec release (1.7.1) was back in 2010. >>> Since then the following issues were fixed: >>> >>> GERONIMO-5842 >>> GERONIMO-6165 >>> GERONIMO-6438 >>> GERONIMO-6471 >>> GERONIMO-6480 >>> GERONIMO-6530 >>> + some NOTICE/legal stuff >>> >>> I'd like to propose to make a new release (1.7.2 or maybe 1.8.0 ?) >>> because of the above mentioned fixes and the fact that this is >>> prerequisite to make a new javamail 1.4 provider impl release (which >>> will fix a lot of longstanding bugs). >>> >>> I volunteer to drive this but i need some help because geronimo >>> release/QA process is new to me. >>> Maybe its also necessary/useful to run the TCKs to which i had no access >>> (yet). >>> >>> Opinions? >>> >>> Thanks >>> Hendrik >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22) >>> @hendrikdev22 >>> PGP: 0x22D7F6EC > > > > -- > Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22) > @hendrikdev22 > PGP: 0x22D7F6EC
