great On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> wrote: > for javamail we need both > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau > http://www.tomitribe.com > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com > https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > 2015-02-04 12:51 GMT+01:00 Hendrik Dev <[email protected]>: >> do we plan to release javamail alpha specs only or specs and impl? i >> ll vote for both >> >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> 1.8.0 sounds good. If anyone with a setup to run TCKs can do it it >>> would be awesome otherwise we can do a 1.8.0-alpha-1 without this >>> check. >>> >>> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>> @rmannibucau >>> http://www.tomitribe.com >>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >>> https://github.com/rmannibucau >>> >>> >>> 2014-12-03 13:59 GMT+01:00 Hendrik Dev <[email protected]>: >>>> Hi Devs, >>>> >>>> last geronimo javamail 1.4 spec release (1.7.1) was back in 2010. >>>> Since then the following issues were fixed: >>>> >>>> GERONIMO-5842 >>>> GERONIMO-6165 >>>> GERONIMO-6438 >>>> GERONIMO-6471 >>>> GERONIMO-6480 >>>> GERONIMO-6530 >>>> + some NOTICE/legal stuff >>>> >>>> I'd like to propose to make a new release (1.7.2 or maybe 1.8.0 ?) >>>> because of the above mentioned fixes and the fact that this is >>>> prerequisite to make a new javamail 1.4 provider impl release (which >>>> will fix a lot of longstanding bugs). >>>> >>>> I volunteer to drive this but i need some help because geronimo >>>> release/QA process is new to me. >>>> Maybe its also necessary/useful to run the TCKs to which i had no access >>>> (yet). >>>> >>>> Opinions? >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Hendrik >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22) >>>> @hendrikdev22 >>>> PGP: 0x22D7F6EC >> >> >> >> -- >> Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22) >> @hendrikdev22 >> PGP: 0x22D7F6EC
-- Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22) @hendrikdev22 PGP: 0x22D7F6EC
