Hi bundle manifest is surely not correct - think nobody tested it in osgi yet but for other use cases it should be fine. Sources were written @apache (and just compared to the spec, not copied from the spec) so we shouldnt need to add the RI in the notice AFAIK.
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber <http://www.tomitribe.com> 2015-03-24 13:18 GMT+01:00 Bernd <[email protected]>: > Hello, > > I noticed that the JAX-RS Spec Pom is not listed on the Maven site ( > http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/specs/index.html under "Modules"). When > I look into the source repository I see in the POM that it puts "1.1" in > the Bundle manifest and OSGi exports. So I wonder if this project is > already "production ready" or abandoned. > > Another question, the NOTICE file does not mention anything about the > source of the code. Is it typically decided that there is no need to > mention the license of the spec PDFs or the RI files? > > Gruss > Bernd >
