> On Mar 24, 2015, at 10:24 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi > > bundle manifest is surely not correct - think nobody tested it in osgi yet
Most likely cause those using JAX-RS 2.0 in OSGi are using the servicemix bundle: org.apache.servicemix.specs.jsr339-api-2.0 which is based on the reference impl jar. At least that’s what CXF is using. Dan > but for other use cases it should be fine. Sources were written @apache (and > just compared to the spec, not copied from the spec) so we shouldnt need to > add the RI in the notice AFAIK. > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Tomitriber > > 2015-03-24 13:18 GMT+01:00 Bernd <[email protected]>: > Hello, > > I noticed that the JAX-RS Spec Pom is not listed on the Maven site > (http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/specs/index.html under "Modules"). When I > look into the source repository I see in the POM that it puts "1.1" in the > Bundle manifest and OSGi exports. So I wonder if this project is already > "production ready" or abandoned. > > Another question, the NOTICE file does not mention anything about the source > of the code. Is it typically decided that there is no need to mention the > license of the spec PDFs or the RI files? > > Gruss > Bernd > -- Daniel Kulp [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
