I just looked, the implementation of ServiceLoader is different for
SeContainerInitializer and CDIProvider.

https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/blob/trunk/geronimo-jcdi_2.0_spec/src/main/java/javax/enterprise/inject/se/SeContainerInitializer.java#L47

https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/blob/trunk/geronimo-jcdi_2.0_spec/src/main/java/javax/enterprise/inject/spi/CDI.java#L54

I know the latter does not work on OSGi environments, it relies on TCCL.

John

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 7:38 AM Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote:

> Hi Guillaume!
>
> I totally agree, but does this really block this release?
> I just moved over the OSGi setup from jcdi-1.1 and changed the versions.
> Is there any OSGi related bug I did overlook or is the support so far not
> enough?
>
> Would it work for you to get this version out of the door and then ship
> some patches which improve OSGi support?
> I'd happy to also work on improved OSGi support over at OpenWebBeans.
> But that's kind of 'improvement' and not a blocker for a release again
> imo, isn't?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> > Am 27.06.2017 um 13:29 schrieb Guillaume Nodet <gno...@apache.org>:
> >
> > -0
> >
> > It would be nice to have all the new specs released in an OSGi
> compatible way or not include OSGi support.  The current state (OSGi
> metadata, but no way to find the provider) is not very satisfying imho.
> >
> > 2017-06-27 11:16 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing our geronimo-jcdi_2.0 spec jar in
> version 1.0
> > This is the API for CDI-2.0. The artifact does pass the CDI TCK and is
> binary compatible with the official artifact (signature comparison passed).
> >
> > The staging repo is:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1034/
> >
> > The source release and binary is here:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1034/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jcdi_2.0_spec/1.0/
> >
> > Please VOTE:
> >
> > [+1] yeah, let's ship it!
> > [+0] meh, don't care
> > [-1] nope, because ${showstopper}
> >
> > The VOTE is open for 72h
> >
> > Here is my own +1
> >
> > txs and LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ------------------------
> > Guillaume Nodet
> >
>
>

Reply via email to