if ok I will try to upgrade
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> 2017-07-04 8:22 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: > Hi all! > > I think I already created a Jenkins job > https://builds.apache.org/job/GeronimoConfig/ > > Since there is now an official RC1 API available we should upgrade to that. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > Am 04.07.2017 um 00:39 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected] > >: > > > > > > > > Le 4 juil. 2017 00:01, "John D. Ament" <[email protected]> a écrit > : > > All, > > > > I noticed a couple of things with running Geronimo Config locally. > > > > - If I build from source (the MP config repo) and then build Geronimo > Config its all good. However, when the JAR is downloaded via the maven > repo, I get errors like this: > > > > arquillianBeforeTest(org.eclipse.microprofile.config.tck.ConverterTest) > Time elapsed: 0.003 sec <<< FAILURE! > > > > java.lang.RuntimeException: Could not inject members > > > > Caused by: org.apache.webbeans.exception.ProxyGenerationException: > java.lang.SecurityException: class "org.eclipse.microprofile. > config.Config$$OwbNormalScopeProxy0"'s signer information does not match > signer information of other classes in the same package > > > > Caused by: java.lang.SecurityException: class "org.eclipse.microprofile. > config.Config$$OwbNormalScopeProxy0"'s signer information does not match > signer information of other classes in the same package > > > > I suspect its because security manager is enabled and the OWB proxies > are ending up in the same package as the Eclipse classes. Of course it > could have been a temporary thing as I had a local cached build. > > > > > > > > - There's no Jenkins job. Would anyone be against adding a Jenkins job? > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > - There's only tests for OWB. Would anyone be against adding tests for > Weld? > > > > > > > > +0 while it stays simple (not the same hierarchy DS has for instance but > think it is doable) > > > > - There's still one failing TCK assertion, > > > > > > > > Tests run: 36, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.584 > sec <<< FAILURE! - in TestSuite > > > > can_inject_simple_values_when_defined(org.eclipse. > microprofile.config.tck.CDIPlainInjectionTest) Time elapsed: 0.023 sec > <<< FAILURE! > > > > java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: > "org.eclipse.microprofile.config.configproperty.unconfigureddvalue" > > > > at org.eclipse.microprofile.config.tck.CDIPlainInjectionTest. > getBeanOfType(CDIPlainInjectionTest.java:110) > > > > at org.eclipse.microprofile.config.tck.CDIPlainInjectionTest.can_ > inject_simple_values_when_defined(CDIPlainInjectionTest.java:67) > > > >
