Personally, using github + git makes it easier to track where contributions are coming from, otherwise you need to mention in commit message or back in an issue about who created the patch. Right now, SVN works well enough, but we'll see if it hinders contributions.
Here's the repo on github - https://github.com/apache/geronimo-config John On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 2:19 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> wrote: > +0 as well, proposed it cause we got an unknown issue at tomee preventing > the proxying with a sub svn tree. Super fine to move lazily if we hit a > blocker only. > > Le 18 juil. 2017 07:36, "Mark Struberg" <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> I'm actually quite happy with SVN for Geronimo. >> In SVN you can easily move things around. In GIT you have to create a >> separate repo for each module. >> That might become a bit much >> So for now SVN works fine for me. No strong feelings though. >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >> > Am 18.07.2017 um 07:28 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < >> [email protected]>: >> > >> > Hmm, maybe we should move to git before they do the proxy. Any blocker? >> > >> > Want to give a try for jbake? TomEE and Meecrowave have pdf support for >> pages which can be something we want to import (nice for offline reading) >> but can be done after. Anyway, big +1 for it. >> > >> > Le 18 juil. 2017 06:38, "Mark Struberg" <[email protected]> a écrit : >> > Great, txs a bunch! >> > >> > LieGrue, >> > strub >> > >> > >> > > Am 18.07.2017 um 00:10 schrieb John D. Ament <[email protected]>: >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 1:02 AM Romain Manni-Bucau < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> > > >> > > Le 17 juil. 2017 04:13, "John D. Ament" <[email protected]> a >> écrit : >> > > All, >> > > >> > > Would anyone be against mirroring the Geronimo Config module on >> github? I think it would be a good thing to get more people aware of the >> feature. >> > > >> > > +1 >> > > >> > > >> > > Ok, I've requested it >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/servicedesk/customer/portal/1/INFRA-14619 >> though at some point we may want to consider git repos (which are now fully >> self serve). >> > > >> > > >> > > Second, who can I talk to get access to edit >> http://geronimo.apache.org/ ? I think it would be good to start adding >> docs on how to use Config. >> > > >> > > Do we want to use confluence or use a static generated site? (Based >> on jbake?) >> > > >> > > This option makes it easier to contribute IMO and to maintain. >> > > >> > > I agree, the usage of confluence for a website feels weird. I >> wouldn't mind spending time working on a new website for Geronimo. I've >> been able to get jbake working obviously for other sites. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > John >> > > >> > >> >>
