I didn't see any additional follow up, so I can plan to start a new geronimo site using jbake. Does someone want to create a repo? I personally would prefer git, as that seems to be the direct infra is pushing towards today for projects.
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 1:29 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> wrote: > Hmm, maybe we should move to git before they do the proxy. Any blocker? > > Want to give a try for jbake? TomEE and Meecrowave have pdf support for > pages which can be something we want to import (nice for offline reading) > but can be done after. Anyway, big +1 for it. > > Le 18 juil. 2017 06:38, "Mark Struberg" <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> Great, txs a bunch! >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >> > Am 18.07.2017 um 00:10 schrieb John D. Ament <[email protected]>: >> > >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 1:02 AM Romain Manni-Bucau < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > >> > Le 17 juil. 2017 04:13, "John D. Ament" <[email protected]> a >> écrit : >> > All, >> > >> > Would anyone be against mirroring the Geronimo Config module on >> github? I think it would be a good thing to get more people aware of the >> feature. >> > >> > +1 >> > >> > >> > Ok, I've requested it >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/servicedesk/customer/portal/1/INFRA-14619 >> though at some point we may want to consider git repos (which are now fully >> self serve). >> > >> > >> > Second, who can I talk to get access to edit >> http://geronimo.apache.org/ ? I think it would be good to start adding >> docs on how to use Config. >> > >> > Do we want to use confluence or use a static generated site? (Based on >> jbake?) >> > >> > This option makes it easier to contribute IMO and to maintain. >> > >> > I agree, the usage of confluence for a website feels weird. I wouldn't >> mind spending time working on a new website for Geronimo. I've been able >> to get jbake working obviously for other sites. >> > >> > >> > >> > John >> > >> >>
