+1, we can use meecrowave site generator if we want (it uses jbake) or anything else if preferred like antora which allows to be versionned using tags/branches
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> 2018-03-19 16:05 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: > sounds good to me. > Do we have a blueprint which we can use as a base? > > I'd suggest to still have the old site as backup to reference to. > But start adding our new projects to the new site. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > On Monday, 19 March 2018, 10:41:15 CET, Romain Manni-Bucau < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > anyone able to help to rebrand the website? > > I propose to use static generators for the "mainstream" projects and bind > them under a subcontext using the project name (dropping geronimo prefix if > used, ex: /safeguarad, /xbean, /config). > > The root should contain the targets of the projects (umbrella goals) + asf > standard stuff. > > Now I'm not familiar enough with current site deployment to move alone > forward. > > > So here are the questions: > > 1. anyone against it? > 2. anyone able to help to start binding the new sites when available? > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> >
